Comprehensive Comparison of Leading Low-Code Platforms; Appian, Mendix, and OutSystems: Choosing the Best Low-Code Platform
The adoption of low-code platforms has exploded in recent years, revolutionizing how organizations build, deploy and manage business applications. With demand for apps massively outpacing the capacity of developer teams, low-code platforms enable rapid delivery of applications with minimal hand-coding.
Appian, Mendix and OutSystems stand out as three of the top leaders in the low-code space. This in-depth comparison provides a comprehensive analysis of the capabilities of these platforms across key criteria.
The Rise of Low-Code Platforms
Low-code platforms utilize visual, model-driven techniques to accelerate development of web and mobile applications. Instead of writing thousands of lines of complex code, developers can use drag-and-drop interfaces and configurable templates to build apps faster.
According to recent surveys, nearly 70% of organizations are now using some form of low-code platforms for application development. The benefits driving this adoption include:
- Faster time-to-market – Apps can be delivered in weeks or months rather than years
- Citizen developer empowerment – Low-code tools enable non-coders to build apps
- Improved productivity – Developers can do more with less code
- Enhanced collaboration – Cross-functional teams can cooperatively build apps
- Greater flexibility – Apps can be changed and updated quickly
- Cost savings – Less manual coding lowers development costs
The low-code market is projected to grow at a CAGR of over 30% to reach $20 billion by 2025. Appian, Mendix and OutSystems stand out as top leaders in this accelerating market.
Overview of Appian, Mendix and OutSystems
Appian is a cloud-native low-code automation platform optimized for developing complex enterprise workflows, processes and case management applications. Founded in 1999, Appian pioneered low-code for business process management (BPM) and case management.
Mendix is a leading pure-play low-code platform designed for cloud-native development of web and mobile applications. Acquired by Siemens in 2018, Mendix utilizes a microservices architecture and open standards model.
OutSystems was founded in 2001 and focuses on advanced visual modeling and AI-assisted development capabilities for the full application lifecycle. OutSystems enables rapid delivery of omni-channel apps.
All three platforms have strong capabilities but differ in their specific approach, target users, and strengths. This detailed comparison will break down how Appian, Mendix and OutSystems stack up across key evaluation criteria.
Target Users
A major difference between Appian, Mendix and OutSystems is their target developer personas and users.
Appian is optimized for business users and non-technical citizen developers. The intuitive, forms-based interface is designed for users familiar with workflows and processes but with limited coding skills. Appian abstracts away the technical complexity, enabling collaboration between business analysts and IT.
Mendix provides more sophistication and customization capabilities required by professional developers and engineers. While still low-code, Mendix offers advanced design patterns, integration options and architectural flexibility ideal for skilled developers.
OutSystems strikes a balance, providing visual modeling and automation suited for either professional developers or advanced citizen developers. The drag-and-drop interface can be adapted for varying skill levels.
In summary, Appian is ideal for non-technical users, Mendix caters to developers, and OutSystems spans both groups. Organizations should weigh their mix of developer skills and resources when selecting a low-code platform.
Development Approach
Low-code platforms share common principles but differ in their specific development approaches and application architectures.
Appian
Appian utilizes a proprietary stack optimized for quickly building cloud-native process applications. Key elements include:
- Drag-and-drop process modeling – Easily map workflows with clicks not code
- Native mobility – Multi-channel apps from a single design
- Low-code data handling – Point-and-click integration to data sources
- Pre-built components – Accelerate development leveraging re-usable objects
- Robust APIs – Connect securely to external services and AI
Appian provides powerful out-of-the-box tools for automating processes and cases without extensive coding. But reliance on proprietary technology can cause vendor lock-in.
Mendix
Mendix emphasizes open standards and embraces cloud native architecture. The platform provides:
- Microservices framework – Natively built for the cloud
- Open ecosystem – Extend platform leverage open source code
- Rapid prototyping – Quickly iterate on designs and features
- Omni-channel apps – Unified web, mobile, wearable experiences
- Robust integration – 200+ connectors to systems and data
- Collaborative development – Built-in DevOps and GIT integration
The flexibility of Mendix comes with a steeper learning curve. But for advanced projects, Mendix enables highly scalable and resilient enterprise applications.
OutSystems
OutSystems focuses heavily on visual models of application logic and processes. Developers can visually represent complex application workflows with minimal code. Key highlights:
- Visual modeling – Visually express application logic and flows
- AI-assisted development – Provides recommendations and optimizations
- Drag-and-drop UI – Easily build multi-channel application interfaces
- Integrated cloud services – Connect to dozens of cloud platform APIs
- Single-click deployment – Package and deploy apps anywhere
- Omni-channel – Supports web, mobile, wearables, and IoT
While leaning toward more proprietary technology, OutSystems still enables advanced web and mobile applications faster than traditional coding.
Ease of Use
Low-code platforms should accelerate development and be usable by developers of all skill levels. Here is how Appian, Mendix and OutSystems compare on ease of use:
Appian is designed from the ground up to be intuitive for non-programmers. The interface relies on forms, drag-and-drop design, and simple data configuration. Minimal technical chops are required to assemble processes and workflows. Appian also provides hands-on training and support to onboard citizen developers.
Mendix provides visual abstraction on top of a more sophisticated platform architecture. While easier than traditional coding, Mendix has a steeper learning curve compared to Appian’s user-friendly interface. Mendix is better suited for professional developers who are comfortable diving into complexity.
OutSystems strikes a balance in ease of use – the platform can be adapted for both novice citizen developers as well as advanced pros. Drag-and-drop wiring of application logic is straightforward, but the platform also supports sophisticated data modeling and coding capabilities.
For pure ease of use and onboarding speed, Appian leads the pack. But Mendix and OutSystems offer more customization for complex use cases.
Flexibility and Extensibility
A major benefit of low-code platforms is the ability to build apps faster. But speed should not come at the expense of flexibility. Here is how these platforms compare on extensibility:
Appian utilizes a proprietary stack which can restrict the ability to customize beyond the core platform. Apps are tightly coupled to Appian’s cloud architecture. While extensibility is possible via open APIs, flexibility is not Appian’s primary strength.
Mendix embraces open standards and makes it easy to incorporate open source libraries and frameworks. Apps can be built using modular architecture principles and decoupled from the Mendix platform. This enables greater flexibility and prevents lock-in.
OutSystems provides cloud-agnostic deployment and integration capabilities. But custom code extensions must be done within OutSystems’ framework. While not as flexible as Mendix, OutSystems still allows plenty of customization for enterprise apps.
For advanced projects requiring specialized extensions, Mendix’s open and modular architecture makes it the most adaptable low-code platform.
Governance and Security
Robust governance and security capabilities are crucial for enterprise adoption of low-code platforms. Here is how the offerings compare:
Appian provides strong identity management, access controls and data encryption. The platform meets key industry compliance standards and Appian apps can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud. Appian also offers pre-built HIPAA-compliant application templates.
Mendix has configurable security profiles, access rules and supports single sign-on integration. While security capabilities are decent, this is one area where Mendix trails more governance-focused platforms like Appian and OutSystems.
OutSystems enables enterprise-grade security controls and permissions mapping. Apps are automatically scanned for security flaws prior to deployment. OutSystems also provides advanced data governance features to support compliance requirements.
For regulated industries and applications handling sensitive data, OutSystems currently leads in governance and security capabilities among low-code platforms.
Application Types
Low-code platforms should excel at delivering a variety of application experiences – from web to mobile and beyond.
Appian focuses on process applications and specialized workflows. While it supports web and mobile apps, Appian is not optimized for advanced user experiences or cutting-edge interfaces.
Mendix provides robust web and especially mobile application capabilities. Developers can build progressive web apps, native iOS/Android apps, and multi-experience omnichannel apps from a single codebase.
OutSystems enables adaptive web and mobile apps with advanced UI capabilities. Apps can be optimized and intelligently routed based on user device and context. OutSystems also supports wearables, IoT and other emerging device types.
For top-tier mobile and web experiences, Mendix and OutSystems lead the market in low-code development.
Workflow, BPM and Case Management
Process automation and workflow capability are key strengths of low-code platforms. Here is how the leaders stack up:
Appian is purpose-built for workflow automation and BPM. The platform pioneered low-code process automation and remains the leader. Appian makes it simple to model complex processes as a series of drag-and-drop workflow steps.
Mendix provides connectors to integrate with leading BPM engines but lacks native process modeling capabilities. While workflows can be developed, Mendix does not match the versatility of Appian for advanced process applications.
OutSystems enables workflow visualization and automation. The platform supports sophisticated process modeling and case management application development. But OutSystems trails Appian’s deep capabilities for hyper-automation and process orchestration.
For process-heavy applications, Appian is the clear leader thanks to its deep BPM roots and workflow orchestration capabilities.
AI and Machine Learning
Leading low-code platforms are incorporating AI to assist developers and enhance applications:
Appian natively integrates AI and automation capabilities into the platform. AI can be used to optimize processes, accelerate decision-making, and enhance user experiences. Appian also provides pre-built AI objects.
Mendix offers basic AI capabilities – developers can integrate open source libraries like TensorFlow into apps. But Mendix lacks extensive pre-built AI components.
OutSystems enables AI-assisted development to improve application design and performance. The platform also allows developers to build AI/ML capabilities into apps using cloud services.
Appian provides the most integrated and extensible AI capabilities among low-code platforms. AI is a clear differentiator for Appian.
Conclusion
This exhaustive evaluation of Appian, Mendix and OutSystems low-code platforms demonstrates:
- Appian is optimized for non-technical users and development of advanced workflows and process applications
- Mendix is comprehensive low-code platform ideal for professional developers requiring maximum flexibility
- OutSystems provides robust enterprise application development capabilities and excels in visual modeling
While all three solutions empower faster application delivery with reduced coding, each platform has unique strengths aligned to particular use cases and users.
Organizations must weigh factors like target developer personas, application complexity, pace of delivery, governance needs, and extensibility requirements when selecting a low-code platform.
Appian’s rapid workflow development, Mendix’s technical breadth, and OutSystem’s visual modeling are all appealing capabilities. By leveraging the cloud-based low-code revolution led by these innovative vendors, enterprises can transform application development to meet modern digital demands.
Related Articles
